Home > All Posts > Individual Post
Post #828

Re: It's not a video blog if it's on TV

By Deirdre Straughan, class of 81 | "Deirdre Straughan, class of 81" <lists@...> | deirdrebs2002
August 21, 2004 | Post #828 | Topic #826

--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Steve Garfield <steve@o...> wrote: > = It's not a video blog if it's on TV. > > If you are watching a video on yo= ur TV, that has been ripped from a > video blog, it's not a 'video blog' a= nymore. > > It's just a video on a TV. > > All the supporting text is gon= e and there's no way to comment back to > the creator. Okay, my turn to p= lay devil's advocate. Two questions come to mind: - Why can't the video st= and on its own? I looked at some of Jay's stuff today, and didn't think it = needed any print words - his narration and images already told the story. = - What if replies and comments could be made in video instead of text? NB= : I never had an actual blog until today, nor felt a need to; I already had= a publishing model that worked fine for the kinds of material I've been pr= oducing up til now. But, in order to see what it's all about, I've started = a blog, http://deirdres.typepad.com/deirdrestraughan/ - no video so far, I = am studying others' blogs to see how they're getting video into Typepad! b= est regards, Deirdr=E9 Straughan http://www.straughan.com