Home > All Posts > Individual Post
Post #220

Re: [videoblogging] formats

By Adrian Miles | Adrian Miles <adrian.miles@...> | adrianlmiles
June 30, 2004 | Post #220 | Topic #140

On 27/06/2004, at 5:16 AM, Lucas Gonze wrote: > There are four, WMV, mpeg, Real and mov. The three proprietary formats > have limited support outside of their dedicated rendering tools, WMP > for > WMV, Real for Real, QuickTime for mov. mpeg is supported by all video > renderers as far as I know. Quicktime is not actually a file format but a file architecture that allows the playing back of formats. the difference is significant (for eg i can play back some avi's inside of a quicktime movie, and qt 6 fully supports flash 5 files). > > I don't know enough to compare video quality and compression. at the technical level signficant, at the domestic level it's PAL versus Beta. One is better but in most contexts and with most people's skill and knowledge the differences become minor. Ben Waggoner has a book on video compression, that's where you go if you want to find the nitty gritty stuff. > > Open standards are a very good thing for bloggish collaboration. My > guess > is that mpeg video is more likely to be watched than any of the other > formats, and more likely to lead to a healthy collaborative > environment. mpeg 4 is probably best. mpeg 1 and 2 are not for networked environments. Keep in mind that i *think* window's version of mpeg 4 (which is an open standard) does not conform. > > Real is the format I've used the most. In my experience, SMIL support > is > Real's edge. Real's video format is nothing special. Real does support SMIL best. QT supports SMIL but not as well as Real. In quicktime pro mpeg 4 is OK, sorenson 3 is excellent but slow to compress as it does two passes if you're using the professional codec. which remminds me, sorenson 3 is in quicktime but if y ou're serious abut cmpression you pay for the pro codec which is *appreciably* better. you don't need the pro codec for playback, just compression. but it is expensive and not open standard so for my money mpeg 4 is definitely superior. if it is just video and audio mpe4 then any compliant player can view it, anywhere. cheers Adrian Miles ................................................................. hypertext.rmit || hypertext.rmit.edu.au/adrian interactive networked video || hypertext.rmit.edu.au/vog research blog || hypertext.rmit.edu.au/vog/vlog/