Home > All Posts > Individual Post
Post #1161

Re: [videoblogging] New Post

By Shannon Noble | Shannon Noble <sn@...> | sh7nnon
September 14, 2004 | Post #1161 | Topic #514

Now that you pointed that out I will change it. At the time I was confused enough by the procedure of getting something online plus figuring out what the licensing meant....well I pushed a couple buttons. Yours too. I'll fix it if that's able. I don't quite understand the licensing concept anyways. On 9/14/04 10:35 AM, "Andreas Haugstrup" <videoblog@...> wrote: > On Sat, 11 Sep 2004 10:51:44 -0700, Shannon Noble <sn@...> wrote: > >> http://x.nnon.tv/blog/_archives/2004/9/11/138589.html >> >> Using footage from some of you here. > > I watched it when you put it on archive.org earlier. There I was > disappointed to see that you had chosen to make it available under the > NoDerivs license. Was that a mistake or why did you choose this? > > It just seems wrong to me that while you are counting on others to provide > you footage, you don't want any to reuse your material. > > Remember that if you are using footage license with a sharealike license > you have to make your work available under the same license. This could > lead to some interesting problems where a movie is made up of clips with > different sharealike licenses... > > - Andreas --This is Vlog: http://x.nnon.tv/