Re: [videoblogging] no video iPod?
On Fri, 29 Oct 2004, Andreas Haugstrup wrote: > On Thu, 28 Oct 2004 17:47:47 -0400 (EDT), Lucas Gonze <lgonze@...> > wrote: > >> But doesn't rel="alternate" describe an alternate version of the >> container? Or is that only for link and not a tags? > > rel="alternate" means the same on both <a> and <link> elements. It > describes an alternate version of the current document. I think that implies that rel="alternate" is not an appropriate way to annotate links which point out of the current document, then. We should maybe spin off a group to solve this problem... - Lucas