Home > All Posts > Individual Post
Post #1575

Re: [videoblogging] no video iPod?

By Jay dedman | Jay dedman <jay.dedman@...> | kinshasa2000
October 29, 2004 | Post #1575 | Topic #1552

we once talked about this a while ago.... should we split the group into DEVELOPMENT(videoblogging) and EVERYTHING ELSE(videoblogging)? the past reasoning for staying one group was that the users learn from the developers. is this still true? i like the tech talk. what does everyone else think? On Fri, 29 Oct 2004 12:54:01 -0400 (EDT), Lucas Gonze <lgonze@...> wrote: > > > On Fri, 29 Oct 2004, Andreas Haugstrup wrote: > > On Thu, 28 Oct 2004 17:47:47 -0400 (EDT), Lucas Gonze <lgonze@...> > > wrote: > > > >> But doesn't rel="alternate" describe an alternate version of the > >> container? Or is that only for link and not a tags? > > > > rel="alternate" means the same on both <a> and <link> elements. It > > describes an alternate version of the current document. > > I think that implies that rel="alternate" is not an appropriate way to > annotate links which point out of the current document, then. > > We should maybe spin off a group to solve this problem... > > - Lucas > > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > >