Re: [videoblogging] no video iPod?
But doesn't rel="alternate" describe an alternate version of the container? Or is that only for link and not a tags? On Thu, 28 Oct 2004, Andreas Haugstrup wrote: > > On Thu, 28 Oct 2004 12:30:50 -0400, Joshua Kinberg <jkinberg@...> > wrote: > >> Andreas: This seems like a better use of rel="alternate" > > It's one very good use of rel="alternate" to create links to different > media formats. Like I think I wrote yesterday: > > <ul id="movielist"> > <li><a href="movie.mov" rel="alternate" > type="video/quicktime">Quicktime</a></li> > <li><a href="movie.mp4" rel="alternate" type="video/mp4">MPEG 4</a></li> > <li><a href="movie.3gp" rel="alternate" > type="insert-content-type">3GPP</a></li> > </ul> > > The definition of rel="alternate" has already been set down in the HTML > spec. It just designates multiple versions of the same resource. It's not > limited to different file types, but also translations. > > -- > <URL:http://www.solitude.dk/> > Commentary on media, communication, culture and technology. > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > >