Home > All Posts > Individual Post
Post #1000

Re: [videoblogging] question

By Adrian Miles | Adrian Miles <adrian.miles@...> | adrianlmiles
August 28, 2004 | Post #1000 | Topic #948

On 27/08/2004, at 4:08 AM, Jay Dedman wrote: > Let's say I want to make a bigger screen for my videos. > how do i do it without making the file size too big? chicken and egg sort of question Jay :-) 1. you can make the video present at twice its current size. this is pretty common when using something like Cleaner. you capture/compress at, say, 320x240 but then indicate that the video is to be displayed at 640x480. If you do the compressing right then it can look fine when blown up, but you need to pay attention to black and white levels and stuff. (Because rather than trying to preserve details in shadows just make it black, otherwise it tends to make compression artefacts very visible. Also frees up space for detail in the more important parts of your images.) 2. qt player pro does all this too. not sure why the free player doesn't (though keep in mind thre are lots of applications that can play qt. you don't need to use qt player if you don't want to. just get a free player that supports full screen and multiscale playback.) 3. trivial to script if you script quicktime. as is full screen presentation. now most of this can present the videos larger with no change in file size. but of course you can go bigger with change in file size. keep in mind that doubling dimensions does not double amount of info. needed: 320x240=76800 pixels per frame, 640x480=307200 pixels per frame. It quadruples the amount of info needed. Here you seriously wnat to tweak frame rate, compression rates, and so on. once upon a time, might still be the case, apple engineers would spend up to a week compressing those clips from starwars and stuff that they provided. And they're the people who write quicktime from the inside out. in other words black art where settings for clip 1 will not work for clip 2. general simple advice: if you seriously want to be able to do this easily get Cleaner. expensive but this is one of the things that it is designed for. > > you know, is there anyway we can double the image size that most of us > have > right now? > from 320x480 to ???? > how big can we make the screen? up to you. QT's full screen mode goes full screen in relation to current screen resolution. > > my last video was 10MB which is probably too big for most people. > but is this true? no it isn't. yes it is :-) If they want it, they'll survive it. But does it need it? Lots of questions in there. at the moment i reckon 1mb=1minute is a good approximate rule of thumb, but that requires broadband, but on homeband a 2min movie would take only a few minutes to arrive, which is doable. in this scenario 10mb is a long wait. on broadband it isn't. but if i've got a cheap Australian broadband deal (AUD30.00 month *but* only for 200MB - I know, it's immoral), then watching your video has used up 5% of my monthly limit. From that point of view I'd like to think it was 5% :-) > what's the limit going to be? > varies. People happily downloaded gigabytes of a Star Wars clip at highest quality that I think was an 80MB file. But what can you afford? I've got a pdf on my server (a computer games essay) that got slashdotted over 18 months ago. it still clocks up 50+ downloads a day and in the first 3 days after slashdotting clocked up 3 or 4gig of downloads. file size is only 150kb, but at that point the limit is not what do my clients want to pay but how much am I willign to pay. cheers Adrian Miles ................................................................. hypertext.rmit || hypertext.rmit.edu.au/adrian interactive networked video || hypertext.rmit.edu.au/vog research blog || hypertext.rmit.edu.au/vog/vlog/