Home > All Posts > Individual Post
Post #1690

Re: [videoblogging] Re: Camera

By Adrian Miles | Adrian Miles <adrian.miles@...> | adrianlmiles
November 9, 2004 | Post #1690 | Topic #1671

On 09/11/2004, at 3:00 PM, petertheman wrote: > What *does* make a difference is audio quality. With my small > photocamera I take videos with decent audio as long as I stay close to > the people (half a meter or less), and there's not too much noise. > Audio is the distinguishing factor. Buying a "real" videocamera will > get you better audio, AND will let you attach mikes and such. The > videoquality will be better too, but none of your readers will notice. peter, peter, peter :-) I reckon if I shoot with a 3 chip camera then compress the work looks tons better than what i get from my digital still camera that i then compress, or from my 1 chip camera that I capture then compress. Quality in, makes better quality out :-) but yeah, once it's down to 320x240, or a low bit rate, noise is noise. cheers Adrian Miles +++++++++++++++++++++ http://hypertext.rmit.edu.au/vog/vlog/