Home > All Posts > Individual Post
Post #1489

Re: [videoblogging] Re: vogfeed

By Andreas Haugstrup | "Andreas Haugstrup" <videoblog@...> | andreashaugstrup
October 25, 2004 | Post #1489 | Topic #1469

On Sun, 24 Oct 2004 04:20:55 -0000, Eric Botticelli <eric9897@...> wrote: > I think, for the mainstream audience, they're going to want to watch > the internet like they watch the TV. Like they have been for 50 > years. They are most likely going to expect to be force-fed content > with a spoon; they're not going to want to use the energy to go on an > expedition into the unknown, the internet. That's a load of... It's exactly that kind of predictions that has been nothing but wrong in the course of media history, and I've heard it in many different incarnations. People don't want the radio, they only want the newspaper they know. Why would people want to watch tv when they can easily hear the radio. The internet offers no new possibilities. And so on. Creating amateur tv with a new, non-broadcast distribution, is not looking forward. Maybe a little, but I don't understand why anyone would settle at that when there is something much more useful. Now, whether anyone watches hypermedia on their tv is their own problem. If they're more comfortable with their tv they should keep using it. Just remember that WebTv failed miserably. :o) > So, for us, the pioneers, it doesn't matter all that much. We're > probably all comfortable hiking the mountain. But for the future of > this medium, for all the people content with visiting Mt. Disney, it > may be very pivotal to develope a system to push the content and make > it available on their television at the push of a button. That's fine, and RSS is definately a good way to go in that regard. But you need to push the *right* content! You can't misrepresent your content by pushing the content of someone else. - Andreas -- Personal: <http://www.solitude.dk&gt; File Thingie - PHP File Manager <http://www.solitude.dk/filethingie/&gt;